One intake, once
The risk enters once — from your AMS, your CRM, an ACORD packet, or a web form. Insured, drivers, vehicles, losses, coverage targets: captured as one canonical record.
The architecture underneath is the one from our multi-carrier integration guide: one canonical record, per-carrier delivery, results normalized back.
The risk enters once — from your AMS, your CRM, an ACORD packet, or a web form. Insured, drivers, vehicles, losses, coverage targets: captured as one canonical record.
The record fans out to your carrier panel — through real carrier APIs where they exist, raters where they make sense, and deterministic portal automation everywhere else.
Underwriting questions get answered from the data you have, so what comes back is a quote you can act on — not a teaser rate that dies at the carrier site.
Your agent compares, picks, and binds. Premiums, policy numbers, and documents sync back to the AMS — no rekeying, no “I’ll update it later.”
Quoting from ACORD paperwork instead of a portal session? The same pipeline starts from the forms — quote any carrier from one ACORD, or try the free ACORD autofill from a DOT number.
Your quote-to-bind ratio is bound policies divided by unique risks quoted. Count risks, not quote documents — one submission fanned out to five carriers is one opportunity, and counting it five times flatters nobody. Most agencies cannot compute this number honestly because the data lives across carrier sites, rater history, and a CSR’s memory.
The two levers that move it are unglamorous: speed to first quote (the agency that quotes first binds disproportionately often) and completed comparisons (multi-carrier quotes abandoned halfway because portal number four asked forty questions). Automation moves both — and as a side effect, every submission, quote, and bind lands in one log, so the ratio becomes a query instead of a guess.
A workspace where an agent enters a risk once and can quote and bind across multiple carriers without separately logging into each carrier site. The honest version is an orchestration layer: carrier APIs where available, portal automation where not, with results normalized and synced back to the agency management system.
No — and you shouldn’t. The AMS stays the system of record (AMS360, Applied Epic, EZLynx, HawkSoft, NowCerts, QQCatalyst all work), the rater keeps doing what it’s good at, and the quote-to-bind layer wraps around them. Rip-and-replace is how these projects die.
Both, with an honest asterisk. Where a carrier offers bind-capable APIs, true quote-to-bind is achievable. Where carriers are portal-only, automation carries the submission to the bind screen and a licensed human makes the binding decision — which is also the E&O-sane place for a human in the loop.
It varies by line and channel, but most independent agencies see meaningful gains not by chasing a benchmark — common rules of thumb sit anywhere from 20% to 50% depending on line — and instead by fixing the two killers: slow first quotes and abandoned multi-carrier comparisons. Speed-to-quote is the lever automation moves hardest.
Count bound policies divided by unique risks quoted (not quotes issued — fanning one risk to five carriers is one opportunity, not five). Automation makes the metric trustworthy as a side effect: every submission, quote, and bind is logged, so the ratio comes from the pipeline instead of from memory.
First working demo on your real data inside a week — typically one line of business across two or three of your highest-volume carriers, expanding from there. Flat $2,499 or $4,499/month, cancel anytime.
Building quote-to-bind into your own product rather than buying it? Carrier API integration services covers the engineering version, and hire insurtech engineers if you want the team instead of the project.
Bring one line of business and your top three carriers. We’ll show you the intake → quote → bind path on real data and tell you exactly what’s automatable for your panel — and what isn’t.
Book a 20-min demo call →